About Us

Name: Geek Perspective
Biography
Name:
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Obama's Fallacy of the "Rich" will pay for his Schemes

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 8:07:35 AM
"The number of U.S. households with a net worth of $1 million or more, not including first homes, fell by 2.5 million to 6.7 million in 2008, according to the Spectrem Group report."

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE52A71B20090311
March 11, 2009

If each of the 6,700,000 Millionaires were taxed $253,731 it would pay for the $1.7 Trillion US Spending deficit in 2009 - NOT the budget but the deficit.

If the spending deficit stays at $1.7 Trillion for the next three years of the Obama Administration (it will be much higher) that will be $5.1 Trillion - NOT the budget but the deficit.

If each of the 6,700,000 Millionaires were taxed $761,194 that would pay the spending deficit (NOT the budget but the deficit) for the 1st Obama Administration.

What happens when the "Rich" are broke?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Islam Will Attack America no matter Who is President

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 8:03:05 AM
My contention is that Islam will attack America no matter who is President.

1) The question is Barack Obama aiding and abetting by his cavalier attitude towards Islamic Terrorists?

2) Is Barack Obama by refusing to call 'Terrorist Attacks' by their Rightful name and instead calling them "Man Made Disasters" emboldening Islamic attacks?

3) Is Barack Obama helping to give Islam important strategic Intel by trying Islamic Terrorists as Criminals instead of Terrorists?

4) Is Barack Obama placing Islamic Terrorists Rights above the safety of American Citizens in general and the Citizens of New York in particular for Political Reasons?

5) Will Obama's denigration and neutering of the CIA help terrorists kill Americans?
(thanks Elko-Mike)

I say a resounding YES to the above five questions.

What say you?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama Administration "Rules" by Crisis

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:45:33 AM
The central theme of the 'Barack Obama Administration’ is to keep the American Citizens in a state of 'Fear' and alarm, with Crisis after Crisis.

"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. Things that we postponed for too long, that were long-term, are now immediate and must be dealt with. This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do before."
Rahm Emanuel, White House chief of staff.

The Goal of these Crises is for the American Citizen to be pliable and ready to be led to safety and bring about the Necessity of declaring 'Martial Law', which "Temporarily" suspends existing rights, rules and regulations in order to deal with the "Crises".

The next major Barack Obama crisis after ObamaCare will be California, gaining Control of California will bring over 1/3 of the American economy to Barack Obama - along with Automobile manufacturing, Banks, Wall Street, Energy through Cap and Trade, Control of the Internet (net neutrality), Control of Talk Radio, Insurance, everyone’s Health Care and well being.

Controlling California will start the complete Control of 'Food'.

There is the Obama plan - food, medicine, health, banks, insurance, Unions, Communications, Wall Street and the largest manufacturers in the United States.

All of this without a 'Shot Fired'.

"We now have not simply a friend, but a people's advocate in the White House."
Sam Webb
Chairman, Communist Party USA
1-31-2009
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Simple Understanding of Looting

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:42:34 AM
Looting has generally been understood in History as the 'Spoils of Wars', to the victor go the spoils.

Looting has occurred many times in America and most recently in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

"NEW ORLEANS - With much of the city flooded by Hurricane Katrina, looters floated garbage cans filled with clothing and jewelry down the street in a dash to grab what they could...

Mike Franklin stood on the trolley tracks and watched the spectacle unfold.

“To be honest with you, people who are oppressed all their lives, man, it’s an opportunity to get back at society,” he said..."
Associated Press
Tues., Aug 30, 2005

Politicians of all 'Stripes' have looted the "Social Security Trust Fund" and then lamented that Social Security was 'Going Broke' - I wonder why?

Looting has become synonymous with 'Social Justice' and Marxist thinking that there is a 'War' going on between the 'Haves and the Have Not's', so that looting is not only justified but necessary.

When Barack Obama declared "I won" on January 23, 2009 in response to a question by Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) who questioned Barack Obama's plan to increase benefits for low-income workers who did NOT owe federal income taxes.

Barack Obama further commented, "You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done."

Critical thinkers understand that Barack Obama has long ago declared War on America and especially the 'Economic System' and sees 'Redistribution of Wealth' as the 'Spoils of War'.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Liberalism Hates and Despises

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:38:19 AM
Self Determination

America was founded on the concept of Individual Freedom, self-determination, free markets and a Society based on the more useful to society you are, the more you are allowed to take from society, IOW, Capitalism.

Societies are either growing, in decline or sometimes static.

Filling a 'Need' in a growing society with goods or services, will result in being rewarded and those who cannot find a way to be useful to society, can expect little in return.

Whether supplying goods or services (labor), reward is based on quality and responsibility of those Individuals who are contributing goods or services.

A Capitalistic system naturally rewards success and responsibility and in 'Effect' punishes those Individuals who are NOT responsible with little reward.

The most menial jobs are rewarded handsomely, if that Individual works hard and provides quality and is dependable.

Liberals view this as grossly unfair, because they 'Feel' that no Individual could possibly contribute more to society than another - after all they state 'All Men are Created Equal', thus all 'Outcomes' should be equal.

This thinking has spawned many methods (Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, ObamUnism) to bring about 'Social Justice' economically, with the Government being Central to referee and 'Redistribute the Wealth'.

These systems naturally reward failure and lack of responsibility and in 'Effect' punishes those Individuals who are responsible with little reward.

Lofty thinkers like Barack Obama state "Redistribution of Wealth will give those that are behind, a Chance to Catch up', when in reality it brings about a lack of initiative to all and a general degrading of Society in general.

Personal responsibility in decisions, actions and self-determination ‘will give those that are behind, a Chance to Catch up', NOT stealing from the responsible and giving the ill-gotten gains to the irresponsible.

Morality

Liberals believe that Morals should be determined by situations and NOT by any Morals that has produced great Humans and Great Societies.

Liberals believe that 'Morality' is determined by 'Motive' and since 'Motive' is Subjective (especially to a Liberal) therefore 'Morality is Subjective' to a Liberal.

This 'Moral Relativism' practiced by Liberals is NOT Rational, but rather Rationalization of actions and and is diametrically opposed to the concept that passions must be evaluated by reason and controlled by will - Plato and Aristotle called this virtue self-control.

Liberals 'Hate and Despise' any mention of 'Morals or Morality', because the underlying principle is 'Self-Control', which by definition makes Individuals 'Responsible' for decisions and subsequent actions.

Liberals believe that any decision or action they take is the Responsibility of someone else.

This is Liberalism in a 'Nut Shell' - someone else should pay for (emotionally or with currency) anything they choose to do in their lives.

Fairness

America was founded on the concept of a limited Democracy or ‘Constitutional Republic’ which is ruled by law, rather than a ‘Pure Democracy’ or mob rule by whatever Party that happens to be in power or control.

A prime example of a 'Pure Democracy' and the 'Right to Choose' whatever the people want (mob rule) instead of the 'Rule of Law', would be a lynching.

Everyone involved in the Lynching has a vote – even the one being lynched, but the mob rules by majority and not by law - this would be described by Liberals as 'Fairness', because the 'People' made their choice by popular vote and Liberals would defend the 'Mob Rule choice'.

'Fairness' to a Liberal is 'Situational' and should be decided by 'Mob Rule' rather than the Constitution or Bill of Rights.

Liberals believe that 'Fairness' should be decided by a Government Worker or 'Fiat of Government' dependent upon whatever political group is in charge.

This can only be described as 'Liberal Insanity'.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal 'Collectivism' for Special Rights

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:28:22 AM
Every American Citizen should have the 'Same' rights and protections, under the US Constitution and Bill of Rights - no more - no less.

One of the things I learned in Game Theory was that 'zero sum' is an interaction in which one participant's gains result only from another's equivalent losses.

When Liberals and Democrats (collectivists) institute their solutions like 'Affirmative Action' or 'Special Homosexual Rights', the rights they give to the 'collectivist group' in favor, results in taking rights from others who are in dis-favor.

IOW, Collectivism creates a 'Superior Class' of Citizens - those with 'Special Rights' - and a 'Inferior Class' of Citizens - those who have lost 'Individual Rights' in order to grant 'Superior Rights' to a different 'Collectivist Group'.

Victimology is the bedrock of Liberal 'Collectivism' and the protected 'Superior Class' are perpetual victims, until the next 'Superior Class' takes precedent, or Politicians change their minds.

The purpose of Liberal 'Collectivism', is to divide citizens along various tribal lines and make them identity with their 'Collectivist' group above all else, thus degrading or eliminating any thought about individual rights.

The real reason for 'Hate Crime' legislation, is that Liberal 'Collectivists' are trying to narrow the range of thought and speech and transmute 'Individual Rights' to 'Collective Rights'.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberals confuse Legality with Morality

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:26:23 AM
It was 'Legal' by Roman Law, to feed Little children to wild animals in the 'Roman Circus' in front of their parents, so the crowd could not only sate their depravity, but also watch in glee the torment of the parents.

It was 'Legal' by Roman Law, for Little babies to be placed by the side of the road and eaten by animals or die from exposure, thirst or starvation and then the remains eaten by Ravens and Vultures.

It was 'Legal' by German Law, for Josef Mengele and the Nazi doctors to experiment on children with experimental surgeries performed without anesthesia, transfusions of blood from one to another, isolation endurance, reaction to various stimuli and they were put into pressure chambers until they died, tested with drugs, castrated, frozen to death. It is estimated that 1.5 million little children died during these experiments.

It was 'Legal' by Iraqi Law, too rape little girls (some as young as 9 years old) in front of their families in Iraq and after they were brutalized too near death, they were placed feet first in a 'Wood Chipper' to delight the onlookers and also watch in glee the torment of the families.

It is 'Legal' by American Law, to jam scissors into a baby's skull, open the scissors to enlarge the skull and then insert a suction catheter to suck the babies brains out causing the skull to collapse, then removing the dead baby from the birth canal (partial birth abortion).

Barack Obama tried to make it legal too allow a baby who had survived an abortion, die from shock, thirst or starvation, without any medical help or pain medication.

Millions cheer in the 'Circus of Politics' - YES WE CAN.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal Policies Cause Urban Decay

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:18:27 AM
Government (Liberal) policies causes Urban Congestion, unemployment and crime.

Humans have always been 'Nomadic' by nature, looking for better farming lands, better food supplies and just the adventure of new challenges and searching for a better life.

When the Industrial age began, people flocked to where the work was in the Cities and left the countryside and farms in hope of a better life and a brighter future. Blacks flocked to cities after the Civil war to find jobs and a future.

When other countries began manufacturing cheaper products, jobs began to leave America because of high Union labor costs and Federal and local taxes, many people were left without a way to provide for themselves and their families. Governments began to pay people to stay where they were and even provided them with food and housing.

These Government assistance policies or benefits locked people in place.

Liberal Politicians knew that it was easier to tax and control the population by confining humans in densely packed urban areas.

When more and more people needed and used these benefits, they became dependent upon the Government and began to demand more and more benefits.

At first, there were enough workers to spread the burden of carrying others on their backs.

People and businesses began leaving the urban areas to escape this burden, so taxes had to be raised on the remaining workers and businesses which caused even more to flee.

This vicious cycle has produced cities like Detroit, where those dependent on the Government elected only officials who promised to not only keep the status quo, but promised even more benefits and subsidies.

The cities are becoming worse than third world countries and this decline will not only get worse it is spreading to the suburban areas.

These Government (Liberal) policies began causing new problems.

Government Public Housing concentrated people with nothing to do, because they were paid to do nothing - 'Idleness is the Devils Workshop'.

Crime became highly concentrated in these areas which produced 'Cottage Industries' of prostitution, illegal drug sales, burglars, robbers and other things for those confined in these 'Virtual Crime Centers' to produce supplemental income.

Gangs began to 'Spring Up', to protect the 'Turf' of those engaged in the illegal activities.

Local Government costs began 'Sky Rocketing' which caused even higher taxes and more workers to flee to the suburbs, which by then were experiencing even more 'Decay' themselves.

Local Governments began appealing to the Federal Government for money to help subsidize Police, Education, Hospitals and various things the Local Governments no longer had the funds to operate - this resulted in higher Federal and Corporate taxes and American businesses began out sourcing work or even leaving America to escape the burden of high taxes.

The Federal Government by design or ignorance or a combination of both, began attacking the problems of pollution, caused by more people driving from the Suburbs to the Cities.

Mass transportation became a priority to lessen pollution and bring more workers back into the cities, where they Politicians began finding ways of taxing those workers.

The Federal Government found that High Gasoline prices not only caused less driving of auto mobiles but also had the desirous effect (to the Government), of people moving back to the Cities.

Barack Obama like most Marxists and Governmental theorists, think this 'Cycle of Ignorance' can be solved by even more taxes and more Government intervention, rather then realizing that Government is the root cause of the problem.

Barack Obama and his 'Liberal Minions' realized the 'Fruit of their Labors' in 2008, when those Encapsulated 'Government Crime Zones' (big Cities) voted in droves for the continuance of being housed, fed and clothed on the backs of the Producers (those who actually pay taxes).

Barack Obama has promised to continue this Liberal Madness.

"Obama will create 20 Promise Neighborhoods in cities across the nation that have high levels of poverty and crime and low levels of student academic achievement...to an entire neighborhood from birth to college."
Barack Obama
Blueprint for Change
2008

Liberal Policies cause Destruction and Liberal Destruction is Barack Obama.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama's Corporate Sheriff - Hilda Solis

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:07:52 AM
Soon after she became the nation's labor secretary, Hilda Solis warned corporate America there was "a new sheriff in town."

"...we have to bloc any Republican efforts to derail the nomination of Hilda Solis, the nominee for the Secretary of Labor.

This is the first round in the battle to pass the EFCA. Some may think this is a struggle of only the labor movement. But nothing could be further from the truth. A bigger labor movement in this country would strengthen the struggle on every front..."

Sam Webb
National Chair
Communist Party USA

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama's Lack of Logic Skills

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:06:23 AM
A Human being can be considered "Intelligent" by other Human beings and NOT have good logic skills.

Two of the main functions of "Intelligence" are presenting solutions and then authenticating those solutions in a manner that others can verify and duplicate.

Sometimes these two functions are NOT tightly coupled or do not even involve one another.

Presenting or inventing solutions requires imagination and authentication and verification are purely logical.

Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is a good example of Intellectuals presenting an hypothesis that is not logical and cannot be authenticated and verified using normal Scientific proofs.

This is particularly true in the 'Soft Science' fields where there is no absolute correct answer.

Josef Mengele and the Nazi doctors were intellectuals with high IQ's, who experimented on children with experimental surgeries performed without anesthesia, transfusions of blood from one to another, isolation endurance, reaction to various stimuli and children were put into pressure chambers until they died, tested with drugs, castrated, frozen to death. It is estimated that 1.5 million little children died during these experiments.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels authors of the 'Communist Manifesto' were certainly intellectuals with high IQ's and their theories resulted in the starvation and murder of over 150,000,000 Human beings (so far).

Barack Obama is a pseudo intellectual (IMO) and certainly lacks even a modicum of logical skills.

The Barack Obama Doctrine of borrowing and spending to reduce debt and thereby ensuring financial security in the future (In His Mind) not only shows a lack of logical skills, but also is ridiculous.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Understanding Wikipedia AGW propaganda

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:04:53 AM
"(William) Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia.

Starting in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band members were beginning to gel, Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site.

He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling.

On Feb. 14, he began to erase the Little Ice Age; on Aug.11, the Medieval Warm Period. In October, he turned his attention to the hockey stick graph.

He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band.

Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world’s most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets, followed by others that the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period.

All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles.

His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity.

When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand.

When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions.

Acolytes whose writing conformed to Connolley’s global warming views, in contrast, were rewarded with Wikipedia’s blessings.

In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement."

http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?i d=62e1c98e-01ed-4c55-bf3d-5078af9cb409

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reality is Difficult - Life even more so

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:02:06 AM
One of the worst scenarios a Human faces personally, is the realization that one has been conned by a 'Slick, Glib and Smooth' con man into buying a 'Lemon'.

Barack Obama followers have invested their reputations, emotions, intellects and security in a Con Man Barack Obama.

Barack Obama followers have so heavily invested themselves in Barack Obama, they refuse to face the reality that they have been 'Slicked'.

This is a very difficult thing to face for any Human Being and especially those who are 'Trapped in Limbo' neither child or adult (Liberals).

There will be few who have bought this 'Lemon' that will be able to face reality and accept facts, logic and reason.

Liberals, I understand your pain and anguish as most other Humans do - few if any of us have made it through life without buying a 'Lemon' at some time or another in our lives.

Choose to face reality and write off your mistake or continue to suffer the humiliation of everyone seeing you trying to rationalize your 'Lemon Purchase'.

If you hand Barack Obama a lemonade, he will figure out how to make lemons out of it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Smaller Government 'THE Silver Bullet'?

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:00:03 AM
Non Critical thinkers are always looking for 'THE Silver Bullet' or 'Magic Elixir' that will cure all ills and will bring about a simple solution to 'Complex Problems'.

This is the 'Primary Reason' Barack Obama was elected - that somehow electing a Black President would cure racial strife and bring about 'Racial Harmony'.

Shock of all Shocks, Barack Obama was NOT only the worst possible solution, Barack Obama has already set back race relations 50 years at least.

Now many Americans are touting that a 'Smaller Government' is a 'Silver Bullet' and would restore America to sanity and bring about a restorative cure to our Political System.

Well guess what, our Marxist/Socialist President Barack Obama is in COMPLETE agreement with those who want a 'Smaller Government'!!!!!!

Barack Obama would be ecstatic with a Smaller Government.

A Government without a Legislative Branch (which writes the laws) or Judicial Branch (which reviews the way laws are applied) or even the Executive Branch (which carries out the laws) - all replaced by Barack Obama as 'Supreme Leader'.

The question remains; would a 'Smaller Government' in of and by itself be the antidote for the pending destruction of America and the American way of life?

Would less quantity of Government automatically equate to more quality in Government?

A 'Smaller Government' is a good focal point or goal for our future, BUT IS NOT A GOOD STARTING POINT!!!

America needs a leader who is NOT a 'South Side Chicago' Marxist Punk and elected officials that are determined to Protect and Preserve our Constitution and Bill of Rights, instead of destroy them.

The starting point in preserving America is 'Quality not Quantity'.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BarackObama Cannot even Secure His own Home!

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 6:54:57 AM
Barack Obama holds the most powerful position in the World, with the best trained Soldiers in the World, using the very best technology and weapons.

Barack Obama not only has access to the best surveillance equipment in the World - Obama is the Commander in Chief for crying out loud.

Barack Obama recently had two separate infiltrations into his own house - the White House.

These infiltrations could just as easily been those dedicated to destroying Obama's life and his wife and his children, instead of just being harmless party crashers or people who arrived a day early.

Now Barack Obama wants us to trust him to secure the entire Country and Transportation system etc.

Barack Obama can't even guard his own life, his own families lives, his own house, the lives of his staff and guests.

Trust Barack Obama for our security - I think NOT.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Human mind can Rationalize any decision

Posted by Geek Perspective on Saturday, January 02, 2010 6:47:35 AM
Decisions made by any Human and subsequent actions resulting from those decisions, make one 'Personally Responsible' for those decisions and actions.

The Human mind can Rationalize any decision, any action or anything else for that matter.

Rationalization is the mortal enemy of facts, logic and reason. 

Rationalization is in ‘simple’ terms, a defense mechanism that attempts to explain decisions, actions or behavior in a rational logical manner to themselves and others.

This is an interesting aspect of all Humans, because  a Human cannot be reasoned out of something with facts, logic and reason, when they did NOT use facts, logic and reason to make their decision in the first place.

This brings 'Into Play', Objective and Subjective views of reality.

In simple terms making an 'Objective Decision' is based in neutrality, uninfluenced by emotion, feelings, bias or prejudice and a 'Subjective Decision' is based in emotion, feelings, bias, prejudice and the Humans own personal perspective of reality.

The problem with Humans making 'Objective Decisions', is that Humans do NOT perceive Reality as it is, Humans perceive Reality through the mindset of who they are.

Most (if not all) humans, abdicate or accept their Personal Responsibility in any matter, based on 'Subjective Decisions'.

Many females contend they have the 'Right' to control their own body after conception and until they give birth, but they have NO 'Personal Responsibility' of their bodies before conception.

Many males contend they are NOT 'Personally Responsible' for inseminating a female and feel they are NOT 'Personally Responsible' for any offspring, because the female could have chosen an abortion.

In the matter of rape or incest, the male is 100% 'Personally Responsible'.

In the matter of consensual sex, the male is 50% 'Personally Responsible' and the female is 50% 'Personally Responsible'.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »